Hill v. Life & Casualty Insurance

181 S.E. 104, 51 Ga. App. 578, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 412
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 26, 1935
Docket24522
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 181 S.E. 104 (Hill v. Life & Casualty Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. Life & Casualty Insurance, 181 S.E. 104, 51 Ga. App. 578, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 412 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. Where, in consideration of a payment made to an insurance company of a certain stipulated amount of money as a premium for life insurance, the company agrees that upon the approval at the home office of the application for the issuance of the policy, the company will, in the event of the death of the person to be insured prior to the issuance of the policy, pay to the beneficiary the amount of the insurance which would have been due had the policy been issued, there arises no contract of insurance in the absence of an approval of the application at the home office. The decision in Queen Insurance Co. v. Hartwell Ice & Laundry Co., 7 Ga. App. 787 (68 S. E. 310), is distinguishable in that in that case the insurance company had agreed unconditionally to issue a contract of insurance.

2. Where, in the petition in a suit by the beneficiary to recover, upon, the death of the insured, for a breach of the contract, it nowhere appears that the application for the issuance of the policy had been approved at the home office, the petition failed to set out a valid subsisting contract, and therefore failed to set out a cause of action. The court properly sustained the demurrer to the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenhms, P. J., md Sulion, J., concur. Alec Harris, for plaintiff. Wright & Covington, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

World Insurance v. Blalock
429 S.E.2d 276 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
Powell v. Republic Nat. Life Ins. Co.
337 So. 2d 1291 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1976)
Etheridge v. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society
152 S.E.2d 773 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Peninsular Life Insurance Company v. Rosin
104 So. 2d 792 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Kammerer v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
98 S.E.2d 391 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Paulk v. STATE MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.
69 S.E.2d 777 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Maddox v. Life & Casualty Insurance
53 S.E.2d 235 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Cheek v. Pilot Life Insurance
1 S.E.2d 115 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 S.E. 104, 51 Ga. App. 578, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-life-casualty-insurance-gactapp-1935.