Hill v. Lee County Correctional Institution

Fourth Circuit

Hill v. Lee County Correctional Institution

139 F. App'x 568

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 26, 2005·No. No. 05-6511·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Curtis R. Hill appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hill v. County Corr. Inst., No. CA-05-693-6 (D.S.C. Mar. 25, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Curtis R. Hill appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hill v. County Corr. Inst., No. CA-05-693-6 (D.S.C. Mar. 25, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Hill v. Lee County Correctional Institution, 139 F. App'x 568 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

139 F. App'x 568 (Hill v. Lee County Correctional Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related