Hill v. Julian

46 S.E. 834, 119 Ga. 607, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 296
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 3, 1904·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Turnee, J.

1. The statutory provision that no suit to recover a debt due by a decedent shall be commenced against his legal representative until the expiration of twelve months from his qualification is for the security of such representative, to protect him from suit until he can ascertain the condition of the estate; and if he suffers a judgment to be rendered against him during that period, a claimant of property against which such judgment is sought to be enforced can not bring into question the validity thereof, since its rendition within that period can in no way have operated to his prejudice. Baker v. Shephard, 30 Ga. 706.

2. A finding in favor of the claimant was not demanded by the evidence adduced on the trial of this case in the magistrate’s court wherein it originated; and this being so, the judge of the court below did not abuse his discretion in overruling the petition for certiorari, in so far as it brought under review the verdict of the jury in the magistrate’s court.

'Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Simmons, O. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. Julian, 46 S.E. 834, 119 Ga. 607, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 296 (Ga. 1904).

46 S.E. 834 (Hill v. Julian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cannon v. Tant
195 S.E.2d 15 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1972)
English v. Shivers
141 S.E.2d 443 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1965)
Butler v. Floyd
191 S.E. 460 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)