Hill v. Julian
This text of 46 S.E. 834 (Hill v. Julian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The statutory provision that no suit to recover a debt due by a decedent shall be commenced against his legal representative until the expiration of twelve months from his qualification is for the security of such representative, to protect him from suit until he can ascertain the condition of the estate; and if he suffers a judgment to be rendered against him during that period, a claimant of property against which such judgment is sought to be enforced can not bring into question the validity thereof, since its rendition within that period can in no way have operated to his prejudice. Baker v. Shephard, 30 Ga. 706.
2. A finding in favor of the claimant was not demanded by the evidence adduced on the trial of this case in the magistrate’s court wherein it originated; and this being so, the judge of the court below did not abuse his discretion in overruling the petition for certiorari, in so far as it brought under review the verdict of the jury in the magistrate’s court.
'Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 S.E. 834, 119 Ga. 607, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-julian-ga-1904.