Hill v. Jordan

30 Me. 367
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1849
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 30 Me. 367 (Hill v. Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. Jordan, 30 Me. 367 (Me. 1849).

Opinion

Wells, J.

— The plaintiff, to whom the land was mortgaged, having made an entry upon it, and claimed the possession, such entry put an end to the tenancy at will, subsisting between the defendant and the mortgager. And the defendant by continuing to hold over after the entry, and refusing to become the tenant of the plaintiff, must be considered as having violated his possession, and as a trespasser.

The authorities cited in the argument, and also others, show that the action is maintainable. Smith v. Shepard, 15 Pick. 147; Reed v. Davis, 4 Pick. 216; Mayo v. Fletcher, 14 Pick. 525.

According to the agreement of the parties, the defendant is to be defaulted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bulger v. Wilderman and Pleet
101 Pa. Super. 168 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Me. 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-jordan-me-1849.