Hill v. Jeffreys

Ohio Supreme Court

Hill v. Jeffreys

870 N.E.2d 727, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1473

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 25, 2007

Docket2007-0606

StatusPublished

This text of 870 N.E.2d 727 (Hill v. Jeffreys) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hill v. Jeffreys, 870 N.E.2d 727, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1473 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

In Habeas Corpus. On motion of amicus curiae Ohio Public Defender for leave to file a memorandum in support of petitioner, respondent’s return of writ, petitioner’s motion for leave to file an amended petition, and motion of amicus curiae Ohio Public Defender for leave to file a memorandum in support of petitioner’s motion for leave to amend his petition. Ohio Public Defender’s motion for leave to file a memorandum in support of petitioner is granted. Petitioner’s motion for leave to file an amended petition and Ohio Public Defender’s motion for leave to file a memorandum in support of petitioner’s motion for leave to file an amended petition are denied. Because petitioner failed to attach copies of his commitment papers to the habeas corpus petition as required by R.C. 2725.04(D), this cause is dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Habeas Corpus. On motion of amicus curiae Ohio Public Defender for leave to file a memorandum in support of petitioner, respondent’s return of writ, petitioner’s motion for leave to file an amended petition, and motion of amicus curiae Ohio Public Defender for leave to file a memorandum in support of petitioner’s motion for leave to amend his petition. Ohio Public Defender’s motion for leave to file a memorandum in support of petitioner is granted. Petitioner’s motion for leave to file an amended petition and Ohio Public Defender’s motion for leave to file a memorandum in support of petitioner’s motion for leave to file an amended petition are denied. Because petitioner failed to attach copies of his commitment papers to the habeas corpus petition as required by R.C. 2725.04(D), this cause is dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

870 N.E.2d 727, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-jeffreys-ohio-2007.