Hill v. International Products Co.
226 A.D. 730
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. In addition to failing promptly to notify the defendant of its election tpxrescind, the plaintiffs did not rely upon representations as to right to pay dividends. Findings that plaintiffs relied upon representations as to right to pay dividends reversed. Settle order on notice. Present — Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and Proskauer, JJ. [129 Misc. 25.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hill v. International Products Co., 226 A.D. 730 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).
226 A.D. 730 (Hill v. International Products Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hauben v. Morris
255 A.D. 35 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)