Hill v. International Products Co.
This text of 226 A.D. 730 (Hill v. International Products Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. In addition to failing promptly to notify the defendant of its election tpxrescind, the plaintiffs did not rely upon representations as to right to pay dividends. Findings that plaintiffs relied upon representations as to right to pay dividends reversed. Settle order on notice. Present — Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and Proskauer, JJ. [129 Misc. 25.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 A.D. 730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-international-products-co-nyappdiv-1929.