Hill v. Inhabitants of Seekonk
119 Mass. 85, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 70
Opinion
The instruction that it was enough if the plaintiff looked ahead in such a manner as persons of ordinary prudence do in riding upon a highway was correct. The other instructions were, to say the least, sufficiently favorable to the defendant. The case was rightly submitted to the jury.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hill v. Inhabitants of Seekonk, 119 Mass. 85, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 70 (Mass. 1875).
119 Mass. 85 (Hill v. Inhabitants of Seekonk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McFarlane v. City of Niagara Falls
160 N.E. 391 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)
Cutting v. Inhabitants of Shelburne
78 N.E. 752 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)
Mahnke v. New Orleans City & Lake Railroad
104 La. 411 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1900)
Heckman v. Evenson
73 N.W. 427 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1897)
Woods v. City of Boston
121 Mass. 337 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1876)