Hill v. In Re: the Guardianship of Mary Jacob

199 So. 3d 534
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 5, 2016
Docket5D16-1362
StatusPublished

This text of 199 So. 3d 534 (Hill v. In Re: the Guardianship of Mary Jacob) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. In Re: the Guardianship of Mary Jacob, 199 So. 3d 534 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

SHERYL LYNN HILL, GUARDIAN,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D16-1362

IN RE: THE GUARDIANSHIP OF MARY JACOB,

Appellee. /

Opinion filed September 9, 2016

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Jonathan D. Ohlman, Judge.

Russell W. LaPeer, of Landt, Wiechen, LaPeer, & Ayres, LLP, Ocala, for Appellant.

Dennis J. Moe, of Dennis J. Moe, P.A., Ocala, for Appellee.

ON CONCESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Appellee’s Concession of Error, we reverse the trial court’s “Order

Restoring Certain Rights and Denying Others,” and we remand to the trial court for an

order that is consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

BERGER, WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 So. 3d 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-in-re-the-guardianship-of-mary-jacob-fladistctapp-2016.