Hill v. Hunt
This text of 21 F. App'x 204 (Hill v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Thomas W. Hill appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint raising claims under 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1983, 1985 (West 1994 & Supp.2001), and seeking injunctive, declaratory, and monetary relief, including the removal of a criminal case from state court. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hill v. Hunt, No. CA-01-64-1-T (W.D.N.C. filed May 15, 2001; entered May 16, 2001). We deny Hill’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 F. App'x 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-hunt-ca4-2001.