Hill v. Hill

635 S.E.2d 298, 360 N.C. 577, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 810

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided July 28, 2006·No. No. 638P05·Published

Opinion

1. Pit’s Motion for a Temporary Stay During the Pendency of Appellant’s Motion to Renew the Stay Previously Entered by the Court (COA03-969-2)

2. Pit’s Motion for Reconsideration of Appeal of Right and PDR, and Alternatively Motion for Summary Remand

3. Pit’s Motion for Reconsideration of Petition for Writ of Supersedeas, Including Motion to Review the Temporary Stay

Martin, J. and Timmons-Goodson, J., Recused

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1. Pit’s Motion for a Temporary Stay During the Pendency of Appellant’s Motion to Renew the Stay Previously Entered by the Court (COA03-969-2)

2. Pit’s Motion for Reconsideration of Appeal of Right and PDR, and Alternatively Motion for Summary Remand

3. Pit’s Motion for Reconsideration of Petition for Writ of Supersedeas, Including Motion to Review the Temporary Stay

Martin, J. and Timmons-Goodson, J., Recused

Hill v. Hill, 635 S.E.2d 298, 360 N.C. 577, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 810 (N.C. 2006).

Pincite

635 S.E.2d 298 (Hill v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.