Hill v. Hill
This text of 2 Mass. 150 (Hill v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a libel for a divorce from bed and board only, you nave no occasion to prove a marriage, unless it be denied.
The evidence in support of the charge of cruelty was only of abusive and threatening language.
Curia. Threats of violence, without an actual assault, are not a legal cause for divorce,
The divorce was refused.
Warren vs. Warren, 3 Mass. Rep. 321. — French vs. French, 4 Mass. Rep. 587. — Sed vide, contra, Hulme vs. Hulme, 2 Adams’s Eccl. R. 27. — Oliver vs. Oliver, 1 Hagg. Cons. R. 364. — Kirkman vs. Kirkman, 1 Hagg. Con. R. 409. — Holden vs. Holden, 1 Hagg. Con. R. 458. — Evans vs. Evans, 1 Hagg. Con. R. 35. — Waring vs. Waring, 2 Phil. 132. — Popkin vs. Popkin, 1 Hagg. Eccl. R. 768. — De’Aguillar vs. De’Aguillar, 1 Hagg. Eccl. R. 773. — Westmeath vs. Westmeath, 2 Hagg. Eccl. R. 72, 112, 113. — Barrere vs. Barrere, 4 Johns. Ch. 187. — 2 Kent. Com. 126, 127, 2d ed ; and vide Perkins vs. Perkins, 6 Mass. Rep. 69.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Mass. 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-hill-mass-1806.