Hill v. Hill
This text of Hill v. Hill (Hill v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
DARRYL B. HILL,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 5D18-1192
IRIS ELIZABETH HILL AND PONTE VEDRA ANIMAL HOSPITAL, INC.,
Respondents.
________________________________/
Opinion filed May 17, 2018
Petition for Writ of Prohibition, John M. Alexander, Respondent Judge.
Erin R. Whitmore and Joshua R. La Bouef, of Brennan Manna Diamond, Jacksonville, for Petitioner.
Iris Elizabeth Hill, Palm Coast, pro se.
No Appearance for Other Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Darryl Hill petitions this court for a writ of prohibition, challenging the denial of his
timely motion to disqualify the trial judge presiding over the below proceedings. After a
review of the record, including the transcript from the hearing described in Hill’s motion to
disqualify, we conclude that comments made by the judge at that hearing “were sufficient
to put a reasonably prudent person in well-founded fear of not receiving a fair or impartial hearing or trial.” State v. Gresham, 214 So. 3d 780, 781 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (citing
Shuler v. Green Mountain Ventures, Inc., 791 So. 2d 1213, 1215 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
(holding that fear of judicial bias giving rise to disqualification motion must be objectively
reasonable)). Accordingly, we grant the petition and issue the writ of prohibition.
PETITION GRANTED.
COHEN, C.J., and LAMBERT, J., concur. TORPY, J., dissents without opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hill v. Hill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-hill-fladistctapp-2018.