Hill v. Hill
This text of 326 So. 2d 207 (Hill v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Each of the points presented by this appeal from the final judgment of dissolution of marriage were resolved by the learned trial judge and are supported by competent substantial evidence. While we probably would not have awarded the same amounts of alimony, child support and attorney’s fees as did the learned trial judge, we can not say that as a matter of law he abused his broad discretion. See Dinkel v. Dinkel, Fla.1975, 322 So.2d 22. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is
Affirmed.
Appellant’s application for attorney’s fees and costs incident to this appeal is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
326 So. 2d 207, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-hill-fladistctapp-1976.