Hill v. Hill

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hill v. Hill

326 So. 2d 207, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14281

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 5, 1976·No. No. Y-184·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Each of the points presented by this appeal from the final judgment of dissolution of marriage were resolved by the learned trial judge and are supported by competent substantial evidence. While we probably would not have awarded the same amounts of alimony, child support and attorney’s fees as did the learned trial judge, we can not say that as a matter of law he abused his broad discretion. See Dinkel v. Dinkel, Fla.1975, 322 So.2d 22. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is

Affirmed.

Appellant’s application for attorney’s fees and costs incident to this appeal is denied.

BOYER, C. J., and SMITH, J., concur. RAWLS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Each of the points presented by this appeal from the final judgment of dissolution of marriage were resolved by the learned trial judge and are supported by competent substantial evidence. While we probably would not have awarded the same amounts of alimony, child support and attorney’s fees as did the learned trial judge, we can not say that as a matter of law he abused his broad discretion. See Dinkel v. Dinkel, Fla.1975, 322 So.2d 22. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is

Affirmed.

Appellant’s application for attorney’s fees and costs incident to this appeal is denied.

BOYER, C. J., and SMITH, J., concur. RAWLS, J., dissents.

Hill v. Hill, 326 So. 2d 207, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14281 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

326 So. 2d 207 (Hill v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related