Hill v. Hill

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hill v. Hill

114 So. 2d 462

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 18, 1959

DocketNo. 989

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 114 So. 2d 462 (Hill v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hill v. Hill, 114 So. 2d 462 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order from which this appeal was taken is not final as provided for by Article V, Section 5(3), Constitution of the State of Florida, F.S.A., and Rule 4.4, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A. (See Chapman v. Campbell, 114 So.2d 430, decided by this court on September 16, 1959). An inspection of the record in the case of Johnson [463]*463v. Johnson, 1946, 158 Fla. 315, 28 So.2d 438, relied on by the appellants, divulges that that case was completed, and it was upon that status the probate judge entered an order which was a final order. The instant case is not a concluded one.

The appeal in this cause be and the same is hereby dismissed.

KANNER, Acting C. J., SHANNON, J., and MOODY, JAMES S., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order from which this appeal was taken is not final as provided for by Article V, Section 5(3), Constitution of the State of Florida, F.S.A., and Rule 4.4, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A. (See Chapman v. Campbell, 114 So.2d 430, decided by this court on September 16, 1959). An inspection of the record in the case of Johnson [463]*463v. Johnson, 1946, 158 Fla. 315, 28 So.2d 438, relied on by the appellants, divulges that that case was completed, and it was upon that status the probate judge entered an order which was a final order. The instant case is not a concluded one.

The appeal in this cause be and the same is hereby dismissed.

KANNER, Acting C. J., SHANNON, J., and MOODY, JAMES S., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 So. 2d 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-hill-fladistctapp-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack