Hill v. Henry
This text of 65 Ga. App. 374 (Hill v. Henry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
1. The court did not err in overruling the plaintiff’s demurrer to the amendment to the answer filed by some of the individual defendants.
2. It being shown by the evidence that the “Union Alumni-se Association” was an unincorporated and unregistered society, the court did not err in ruling that it was not a legal entity capable of being sued.
3. The evidence showing that the individual defendants, in whose favor a nonsuit was granted, did not sign the note sued on or authorize any one to sign as agent for them in the name of the society of which they were members, the grant of a nonsuit in their favor was not error.
4. Under the evidence the jury was authorized to find that, although the note sued on was purchased by the plaintiff with his own funds, it was transferred by the seller to and accepted by the plaintiff as being the property of the estate of which he was the administrator, and accordingly to find that he was not entitled to maintain the suit on the note in his individual capacity, and to return a verdict in favor of the defendants against whom the case proceeded.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
65 Ga. App. 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-henry-gactapp-1941.