Hill v. Hayes
This text of 13 A.D.2d 954 (Hill v. Hayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered on September 13, I960, denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondents. Triable issues of fact are presented that prevent the granting of summary judgment to either party. This court does not adopt the factual and legal conclusions reached by Special Term as to defendant’s conduct. It suffices that there are issues of fact concerning such conduct. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Bastow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 A.D.2d 954, 216 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-hayes-nyappdiv-1961.