Hill v. Hayes
229 N.E.2d 698, 20 N.Y.2d 738, 283 N.Y.S.2d 101, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1319
This text of 229 N.E.2d 698 (Hill v. Hayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hill v. Hayes, 229 N.E.2d 698, 20 N.Y.2d 738, 283 N.Y.S.2d 101, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1319 (N.Y. 1967).
Opinion
Motion to further amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended to [739]*739remit the matter to the Supreme Court, New York County, for a new trial in accordance with the mandate and opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States, with costs to abide the event. [See 15 N Y 2d 986, 16 N Y 2d 658, revd. 385 U. S. 374.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Time, Inc. v. Hill
385 U.S. 374 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
229 N.E.2d 698, 20 N.Y.2d 738, 283 N.Y.S.2d 101, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-hayes-ny-1967.