Hill v. Godwin
75 So. 122, 114 Miss. 324
This text of 75 So. 122 (Hill v. Godwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hill v. Godwin, 75 So. 122, 114 Miss. 324 (Mich. 1917).
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This cause is ruled by Martin v. Martin, 69 Miss. 315, 13 So. 267, from which it follows that the court below should not have required security of appellant Sam Hill; and, since that fact must determine the present controversy, the decree of the court below is reversed, and the hill dismissed.
Reversed and dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Old Ladies Home Ass'n v. Platt
172 So. 2d 770 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1965)
Beck v. Robinson
154 So. 2d 284 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1963)
Vaughn v. VAUGHN
118 So. 2d 620 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1960)
Howell v. Howell
127 So. 566 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1930)
Brown v. Franklin
127 So. 561 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1930)
Rife v. Rife
122 So. 739 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1929)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
75 So. 122, 114 Miss. 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-godwin-miss-1917.