Hill v. Giles

50 A. 758, 201 Pa. 215, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 808
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 6, 1902·No. Appeal, No. 163·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The question for our determination on this appeal is whether Lucinda Hill, wife of Smith W. Hill, has a fee simple title to the property in question under the will of Joseph Irwin, deceased, or only a life estate under it. The conclusión arrived at by the learned judge of the court below in his clear and concise opinion plainly and distinctly holds that Lucinda Hill has only a life estate in the land in question. An examination of the cases cited show numerous decisions of this court which sustain the opinion referred to, and satisfy us that no error was committed by the court below.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. Giles, 50 A. 758, 201 Pa. 215, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 808 (Pa. 1902).

50 A. 758 (Hill v. Giles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Singleton v. Gordon Singleton
144 P.2d 138 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1943)
Tscherne v. Crane-Johnson Co.
227 N.W. 479 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1929)
Pacheco v. Fernandez
277 S.W. 197 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Stout v. Good
91 A. 613 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Lee v. Sanson
91 A. 611 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Gordon v. Cadwalader
130 P. 18 (California Supreme Court, 1912)