Hill v. Gardner

Indiana Supreme Court

Hill v. Gardner

16 Ind. 212, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 94

DecidedJune 1, 1861

StatusPublished

This text of 16 Ind. 212 (Hill v. Gardner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hill v. Gardner, 16 Ind. 212, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 94 (Ind. 1861).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case is here upon the evidence. It preponderates, on paper, in favor of the appellant. It might have been otherwise to the hearer and observer of its delivery.

The evidence for the plaintiff, taken by itself, clearly authorized the judgment. It is a- case of weighing, and deducing inference from testimony. ■

S. Ooulson, for the appellant. J. E. McDonald, A. L. Roachc and. Neff da Neff, for the appellee.

The judgment is affirmed, with 2 per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case is here upon the evidence. It preponderates, on paper, in favor of the appellant. It might have been otherwise to the hearer and observer of its delivery.

The evidence for the plaintiff, taken by itself, clearly authorized the judgment. It is a- case of weighing, and deducing inference from testimony. ■

S. Ooulson, for the appellant. J. E. McDonald, A. L. Roachc and. Neff da Neff, for the appellee.

The judgment is affirmed, with 2 per cent, damages and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Ind. 212, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-gardner-ind-1861.