Hill v. Fegles Construction Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Hill v. Fegles Construction Co.

237 N.W. 927, 121 Neb. 875, 1931 Neb. LEXIS 207

Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided June 18, 1931·No. No. 27962·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action under the compensation law brought by the father as a dependent of the deceased. The only question presented is that of the dependency of the father. The trial court found that the plaintiff was partially dependent, within the meaning of the compensation statutes, and made an award thereunder.

Upon a trial de novo, we find the preponderance of the evidence supports our finding that the father who brings this action was partially dependent upon the deceased son; that the judgment of the trial court was' a proper one, and it is made the judgment of this court; and the plaintiff’s attorneys are allowed a fee of $200 in this court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an action under the compensation law brought by the father as a dependent of the deceased. The only question presented is that of the dependency of the father. The trial court found that the plaintiff was partially dependent, within the meaning of the compensation statutes, and made an award thereunder.

Upon a trial de novo, we find the preponderance of the evidence supports our finding that the father who brings this action was partially dependent upon the deceased son; that the judgment of the trial court was' a proper one, and it is made the judgment of this court; and the plaintiff’s attorneys are allowed a fee of $200 in this court.

Affirmed.

Hill v. Fegles Construction Co., 237 N.W. 927, 121 Neb. 875, 1931 Neb. LEXIS 207 (Neb. 1931).

Pincite

237 N.W. 927 (Hill v. Fegles Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.