Hill v. Ewing
This text of Hill v. Ewing (Hill v. Ewing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
No. 14A25
Filed 22 May 2026
MARY A. HILL
v.
RENEE P. EWING, CURTIS E. EWING, HERMAN T. EWING, NATHANIEL V. EWING, and MONICA Y. EWING, the heirs of Annie Marie Ewing, and CORA LEE BRANHAM, HERMAN BRANHAM, ROSLYN BRANHAM PAULING, LARUE BRANHAM, and LEROY BRANHAM, the heirs of Annie Branham, BRIGHT & NEAT INVESTMENT LLC, THOMAS RAY, CLARISSA JUDIT VERDUGO GAXIOLA (aka CLARISSA J. VERDUGO), and GEOFFREY HEMENWAY
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) (2023) from the decision of a divided
panel of the Court of Appeals, 296 N.C. App. 624 (2024), affirming an order entered
on 3 April 2023 by Judge David H. Strickland in Superior Court, Mecklenburg
County, dismissing plaintiff’s claims against defendant Geoffrey Hemenway for
failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Heard in the Supreme Court
on 16 April 2026.
The Odom Firm, PLLC, by Martha C. Odom and Thomas L. Odom Jr., for plaintiff-appellant.
Alexander Ricks, PLLC, by Amy P. Hunt and Miller F. Capps, for defendant- appellee Geoffrey Hemenway.
No brief for defendant-appellees Renee P. Ewing, Curtis E. Ewing, Herman T. Ewing, Nathaniel V. Ewing, Monica Y. Ewing, Cora Lee Branham, Herman Branham, Rosyln Branham Pauling, Larue Branham, Leroy Braham, Bright & Neat Investment LLC, Thomas Ray, and Clarissa Judit Verdugo Gaxiola (aka Clarissa J. Verdugo).
PER CURIAM. HILL V. EWING
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hill v. Ewing, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-ewing-nc-2026.