Hill v. Eldridge

126 Mass. 234, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 217
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 28, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 126 Mass. 234 (Hill v. Eldridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. Eldridge, 126 Mass. 234, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 217 (Mass. 1879).

Opinion

By the Court.

This case does not present the question whether a person can be permitted to testify to the precise day of his birth. It is quite clear that one may testify, from his own knowledge of himself, whether he was twenty-one or sixteen years of age at a certain time, (which was the only material point upon which the testimony of the defendant appears to have been admitted,) and that such weight may be given to his testimony as the court or the jury trying the case may think it entitled to receive. See Cheever v. Congdon, 34 Mich. 296; Watson v. Brewster, 1 Penn. St. 381, 383; State v. Cain, 9 W. Va. 559, 570.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Schut
429 P.2d 126 (Washington Supreme Court, 1967)
Commonwealth v. Joyce
175 A. 422 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)
Mayor of Baltimore v. State Ex Rel. Cirtout
126 A. 130 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1924)
Harris v. Hart
1915 OK 559 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
State v. Rackich
119 P. 843 (Washington Supreme Court, 1911)
Stevens v. Elliott
1911 OK 318 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
Koester v. . Rochester Candy Works
87 N.E. 77 (New York Court of Appeals, 1909)
Travelers Ins. v. Henderson Cotton Mills
85 S.W. 1090 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1905)
State v. Miller
80 P. 51 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1905)
Grand Lodge, Ancient Order of United Workmen v. Bartes
96 N.W. 186 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1903)
Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Lewandowski
190 Ill. 301 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1901)
Crawford v. Crawford
1 Ill. Cir. Ct. 453 (Illinois Circuit Court, 1899)
State v. Marshall
39 S.W. 63 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1897)
People v. Ratz
46 P. 915 (California Supreme Court, 1896)
Commonwealth v. Phillips
39 N.E. 109 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)
Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Blodgett
27 S.W. 286 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1894)
State v. Cougot
26 S.W. 566 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)
Houlton v. Manteuffel
53 N.W. 541 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1892)
State v. McClain
49 Kan. 730 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1892)
Commonwealth v. Stevenson
8 N.E. 341 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 Mass. 234, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-eldridge-mass-1879.