Hill v. District Court of Oklahoma County

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hill v. District Court of Oklahoma County

1971 OK CR 303, 488 P.2d 620, 1971 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 858

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 1, 1971

DocketNo. A-16839

StatusPublished

This text of 1971 OK CR 303 (Hill v. District Court of Oklahoma County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hill v. District Court of Oklahoma County, 1971 OK CR 303, 488 P.2d 620, 1971 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 858 (Okla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a denial of post conviction relief in the trial court attacking the validity of the judgment and sentence entered in the District Court of Oklahoma County, Case No. 69-2854, wherein Freddie Hill, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was sentenced to serve five years imprisonment.

In denying the application for post conviction relief, the trial court noted that the defendant was represented by capable counsel of his own choice and was not deprived of any statutory or constitutional right.

Under the circumstances here presented, we are of the opinion that the appeal from denial of post conviction relief in the trial court should be, and the same is hereby denied. The trial court’s ruling denying post conviction relief is accordingly affirmed.

NIX and BRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a denial of post conviction relief in the trial court attacking the validity of the judgment and sentence entered in the District Court of Oklahoma County, Case No. 69-2854, wherein Freddie Hill, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was sentenced to serve five years imprisonment.

In denying the application for post conviction relief, the trial court noted that the defendant was represented by capable counsel of his own choice and was not deprived of any statutory or constitutional right.

Under the circumstances here presented, we are of the opinion that the appeal from denial of post conviction relief in the trial court should be, and the same is hereby denied. The trial court’s ruling denying post conviction relief is accordingly affirmed.

NIX and BRETT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1971 OK CR 303, 488 P.2d 620, 1971 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-district-court-of-oklahoma-county-oklacrimapp-1971.