Hill v. Cunningham
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6503
KARL KEVIN HILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARK CUNNINGHAM; CHRISTOPHER SHRADER; JOHN CUTRIGHT; R. HIMES; K.S. MCBEE; UNNAMED DEFENDANTS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:09-cv-00135-FPS-JES)
Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 30, 2010
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Karl Kevin Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Deering Mullins, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Karl Kevin Hill appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hill v.
Cunningham, No. 5:09-cv-00135-FPS-JES (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 19,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hill v. Cunningham (Hill v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.