Hill v. Cunningham

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 30, 2010·No. 10-6503·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6503

KARL KEVIN HILL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARK CUNNINGHAM; CHRISTOPHER SHRADER; JOHN CUTRIGHT; R. HIMES; K.S. MCBEE; UNNAMED DEFENDANTS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:09-cv-00135-FPS-JES)

Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 30, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Karl Kevin Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Deering Mullins, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Karl Kevin Hill appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hill v.

Cunningham, No. 5:09-cv-00135-FPS-JES (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 19,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. Cunningham, (4th Cir. 2010).

Hill v. Cunningham (Hill v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related