Hill v. Coughlin

186 A.D.2d 1043, 590 N.Y.S.2d 775, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11635
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 7, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 186 A.D.2d 1043 (Hill v. Coughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. Coughlin, 186 A.D.2d 1043, 590 N.Y.S.2d 775, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

— Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: We reject petitioner’s contention that the Hearing Officer’s determination was not supported by substantial evidence (see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130). We do not find that he was improperly denied documents necessary for his defense. The record shows that such documents did not exist. Moreover, the absence of the supposed documents did not compromise petitioner’s rights. (Article 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Boehm, Fallon and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Green v. Coombe
234 A.D.2d 756 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 A.D.2d 1043, 590 N.Y.S.2d 775, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-coughlin-nyappdiv-1992.