Hill v. Cottrill

2012 Ohio 4581
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided September 27, 2012·No. CT12-0036·Published

Opinion

[Cite as Hill v. Cottrill, 2012-Ohio-4581.]

COURT OF APPEALS MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

MATTHEW HILL. : JUDGES: : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, P.J. Relator : Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J. : Hon. Julie A. Edwards, J. -vs- : : Case No. CT12-0036 KELLY COTTRILL, JUDGE, ET AL : : Respondents : OPINION

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Writ of Mandamus

JUDGMENT: Dismissed

DATE OF JUDGMENT: September 27, 2012

APPEARANCES:

For Relator For Respondents

MATTHEW HILL NONE N.C.I. #478-775 15708 McConnelsville Road Caldwell, Ohio 43724 Muskingum County, Case No. CT12-0036 2

Farmer, J.

{¶1} Relator, Matthew Hill, has filed a complaint for writ of mandamus

requesting this Court to issue a writ requiring Respondent to rule on a motion for

appointment of counsel and motion for transcript at state expense filed in the trial court.

{¶2} Subsequent to the filing of the instant of Complaint, the trial court issued

an order appointing an attorney to represent Relator in his criminal appeal.

{¶3} The Supreme Court has held, “Neither procedendo nor mandamus will

compel the performance of a duty that has already been performed. State ex rel. Grove

v. Nadel (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 252, 253, 703 N.E.2d 304, 305.” State ex rel. Kreps v.

Christiansen (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 313, 318, 725 N.E.2d 663, 668.

{¶4} Because the requested relief has already been obtained, we find the

complaint for writ of mandamus is moot.

{¶5} We also note Relator had an adequate remedy at law by way of filing a

motion for appointment of counsel and motion for transcript in this Court. Muskingum County, Case No. CT12-0036 3

{¶6} For these reasons, the requested writ will not issue and the cause is

dismissed.

.

By Farmer, J.

Delaney, P.J. and

Edwards, J. concur.

s / Sheila G. Farmer______________

s / Patricia A. Delaney_____________

s / Julie A. Edwards_______________

JUDGES

SGF/as 905 [Cite as Hill v. Cottrill, 2012-Ohio-4581.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OHIO

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

MATTHEW HILL : : Relator : : -vs- : JUDGMENT ENTRY : KELLY COTTRILL, JUDGE, ET AL : : Respondents : CASE NO. CT12-0036

For the reasons stated in our accompanying Memorandum-Opinion, the

requested writ will not issue and the cause is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. Cottrill, 2012 Ohio 4581 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).

2012 Ohio 4581 (Hill v. Cottrill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Grove v. Nadel
703 N.E.2d 304 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
State ex rel. Kreps v. Christiansen
725 N.E.2d 663 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)