Home/New York Court of Appeals/Hill v. Corning Inc.

Hill v. Corning Inc.

684 N.E.2d 275, 90 N.Y.2d 884, 661 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 2338
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 2, 1997
StatusPublished

This text of 684 N.E.2d 275 (Hill v. Corning Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. Corning Inc., 684 N.E.2d 275, 90 N.Y.2d 884, 661 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 2338 (N.Y. 1997).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial in part of appellants’ cross motion to amend their bill of particulars, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
684 N.E.2d 275, 90 N.Y.2d 884, 661 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 2338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-corning-inc-ny-1997.