Hill v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hill v. Cohen

30 A.D.2d 572, 292 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3860

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 27, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 572 (Hill v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hill v. Cohen, 30 A.D.2d 572, 292 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 3, 1968, which denied the motion of defendants Cohen and La Hara in action No. 1 to dismiss the complaint in -that action for insufficiency, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 3, 1968, which denied the motion of plaintiffs in action No. 2 for summary judgment in that action, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 3, 1968, which denied the motion of plaintiffs in action No. 2 for the appointment of a receiver in that action, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinions. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 3, 1968, which denied the motion of defendants Cohen and La Hara in action No. 1 to dismiss the complaint in -that action for insufficiency, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 3, 1968, which denied the motion of plaintiffs in action No. 2 for summary judgment in that action, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 3, 1968, which denied the motion of plaintiffs in action No. 2 for the appointment of a receiver in that action, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinions. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 572, 292 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-cohen-nyappdiv-1968.