Hill v. Cockrell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hill v. Cockrell

229 S.E.2d 105, 139 Ga. App. 616, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1911

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 22, 1976·No. 52741·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Webb, Judge.

We remand this appeal with direction that the trial court vacate the judgment, cause appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law to be made, and enter a new judgment thereon, after which the losing party shall be free to enter another appeal. CPA §' 52 (a) (Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a)); Doyal Development Co. v. Blair, 234 Ga. 261 (215 SE2d 471) (1975); Hagin v. Powers, 136 Ga. App. 395 (221 SE2d 245) (1975).

Appeal remanded with direction.

Deen, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur. Submitted September 15, 1976 Decided September 22, 1976. Wendell C. Lindsey, for appellant. Dock H. Davis, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Webb, Judge.

We remand this appeal with direction that the trial court vacate the judgment, cause appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law to be made, and enter a new judgment thereon, after which the losing party shall be free to enter another appeal. CPA §' 52 (a) (Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a)); Doyal Development Co. v. Blair, 234 Ga. 261 (215 SE2d 471) (1975); Hagin v. Powers, 136 Ga. App. 395 (221 SE2d 245) (1975).

Appeal remanded with direction.

Deen, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur. Submitted September 15, 1976 Decided September 22, 1976. Wendell C. Lindsey, for appellant. Dock H. Davis, for appellee.

Hill v. Cockrell, 229 S.E.2d 105, 139 Ga. App. 616, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1911 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

229 S.E.2d 105 (Hill v. Cockrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related