Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Hill v. Cockrell

Hill v. Cockrell

229 S.E.2d 105, 139 Ga. App. 616, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1911
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 22, 1976
Docket52741
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 229 S.E.2d 105 (Hill v. Cockrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. Cockrell, 229 S.E.2d 105, 139 Ga. App. 616, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1911 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Webb, Judge.

We remand this appeal with direction that the trial court vacate the judgment, cause appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law to be made, and enter a new judgment thereon, after which the losing party shall be free to enter another appeal. CPA §' 52 (a) (Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a)); Doyal Development Co. v. Blair, 234 Ga. 261 (215 SE2d 471) (1975); Hagin v. Powers, 136 Ga. App. 395 (221 SE2d 245) (1975).

Appeal remanded with direction.

Deen, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur. Submitted September 15, 1976 Decided September 22, 1976. Wendell C. Lindsey, for appellant. Dock H. Davis, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hill v. Cockrell
232 S.E.2d 384 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 S.E.2d 105, 139 Ga. App. 616, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-cockrell-gactapp-1976.