Hill v. City of Prattville

67 So. 619, 12 Ala. App. 606, 1915 Ala. App. LEXIS 211
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 12, 1915
StatusPublished

This text of 67 So. 619 (Hill v. City of Prattville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. City of Prattville, 67 So. 619, 12 Ala. App. 606, 1915 Ala. App. LEXIS 211 (Ala. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

The circuit court of Autauga county, from whose judgment this appeal is taken, has no jurisdiction of an offense in violation of the ordinances of the town of Prattville, which is the charge here, except upon appeal from a conviction before the recorder of said town. There is nothing in the record before us showing such a conviction and appeal — no judgment of the recorder and no appeal bond. Therefore, for aught appearing in the record to the contrary, the prosecution was originally commenced in the said circuit court of Autauga county upon a statement in writing of the city attorney of Prattville. If so, which in the state of the record mentioned must for purposes here be presumed, the judgment of conviction in the circuit court, from which this appeal is prosecuted, is a nullity and will not support the appeal.—Roney v. Florala, 10 Ala. App. 370, 65 South. 91. The appeal is consequently dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roney v. City of Florala
65 So. 91 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 So. 619, 12 Ala. App. 606, 1915 Ala. App. LEXIS 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-city-of-prattville-alactapp-1915.