Hill v. City of Castle Hills

282 S.W.2d 891, 1955 Tex. App. LEXIS 2088
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 23, 1955·No. No. 12803·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

POPE, Justice.

The trial court, after hearing, temporarily enjoined appellant from using certain property in Castle Hills for business purposes, since the property was zoned for residential uses only. Appellant urges .that the penal provision of the ordinance affords the sole instrument for enforcement, that, it is an adequate remedy, and the injunction should not have been granted.

The judgment is affirmed, since Article lOllh, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.Stats., authorizes the remedy by way of injunction. City of Corpus Christi v. Jones, Tex.Civ.App., 144 S.W.2d 388, 401.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. City of Castle Hills, 282 S.W.2d 891, 1955 Tex. App. LEXIS 2088 (Tex. Ct. App. 1955).

282 S.W.2d 891 (Hill v. City of Castle Hills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duke v. City of Texarkana
468 S.W.2d 483 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Long v. City of Fort Worth
333 S.W.2d 644 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1960)