Hill v. City of Castle Hills
This text of 282 S.W.2d 891 (Hill v. City of Castle Hills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court, after hearing, temporarily enjoined appellant from using certain property in Castle Hills for business purposes, since the property was zoned for residential uses only. Appellant urges .that the penal provision of the ordinance affords the sole instrument for enforcement, that, it is an adequate remedy, and the injunction should not have been granted.
The judgment is affirmed, since Article lOllh, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.Stats., authorizes the remedy by way of injunction. City of Corpus Christi v. Jones, Tex.Civ.App., 144 S.W.2d 388, 401.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
282 S.W.2d 891, 1955 Tex. App. LEXIS 2088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-city-of-castle-hills-texapp-1955.