Hill v. Chesapeake Correctional Center

Fourth Circuit

Hill v. Chesapeake Correctional Center

405 F. App'x 780

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 27, 2010·No. No. 10-6649·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Hill appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hill v. Chesapeake Corr. Ctr., No. 1:10-cv-00273-AJT-JFA (E.D.Va. Apr. 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Hill appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hill v. Chesapeake Corr. Ctr., No. 1:10-cv-00273-AJT-JFA (E.D.Va. Apr. 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hill v. Chesapeake Correctional Center, 405 F. App'x 780 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

405 F. App'x 780 (Hill v. Chesapeake Correctional Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related