Hill v. Central Accident Insurance
59 A. 262, 209 Pa. 632, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 685
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 4, 1904·No. Appeal, No. 77·Published·Cited by 11 cases
Opinion
This judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the court below on the motion to enter .judgment non obstante veredicto.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hill v. Central Accident Insurance, 59 A. 262, 209 Pa. 632, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 685 (Pa. 1904).
59 A. 262 (Hill v. Central Accident Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Rosier
1941 OK 314 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1941)
Lennig v. New York Life Ins.
122 F.2d 871 (Third Circuit, 1941)
Cramer v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
13 A.2d 651 (Atlantic County Circuit Court, N.J., 1940)
Neely v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
185 A. 784 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Ruttenburg, Exr. v. Fire Ins. Co.
186 A. 194 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Watkins v. Prudential Insurance
173 A. 644 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)
Kresse v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
168 A. 634 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1933)
Globe Indemnity Co. v. Reinhart
137 A. 43 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1927)
Baumberger v. Supreme Hive Ladies of the Maccabees
5 Pa. D. & C. 25 (Washington County Court of Common Pleas, 1923)
Curran v. National Life Insurance Co. of the United States
96 A. 1041 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1916)
Kennedy v. Ætna Life Insurance
242 Ill. 396 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1909)