Hill v. Calvert Mortgage Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hill v. Calvert Mortgage Co.

92 S.E. 882, 147 Ga. 135, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 83

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 14, 1917·No. No. 179·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Where, upon the rendition of a judgment by the court on an unconditional contract in writing (the plea having been stricken), a motion for a new trial was filed, complaining of “the verdict,” when no verdict had been returned, and rio pendente-lite exception was taken to the striking of the answer, no. valid assignment of error is Made.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, J.

Where, upon the rendition of a judgment by the court on an unconditional contract in writing (the plea having been stricken), a motion for a new trial was filed, complaining of “the verdict,” when no verdict had been returned, and rio pendente-lite exception was taken to the striking of the answer, no. valid assignment of error is Made.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Hill v. Calvert Mortgage Co., 92 S.E. 882, 147 Ga. 135, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 83 (Ga. 1917).

Pincite

92 S.E. 882 (Hill v. Calvert Mortgage Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related