Hill v. California

396 U.S. 999, 90 S. Ct. 566
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 12, 1970
DocketNo. 730
StatusPublished

This text of 396 U.S. 999 (Hill v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. California, 396 U.S. 999, 90 S. Ct. 566 (1970).

Opinion

Sup. Ct. Cal. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 818.] Motion of petitioner for appointment of counsel granted. It is ordered that Joseph Amato, Esquire, of Palos Verdes Estates, California, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for petitioner in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
396 U.S. 999, 90 S. Ct. 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-california-scotus-1970.