Hill v. Burgess

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Hill v. Burgess

15 S.E. 963, 37 S.C. 604, 1892 S.C. LEXIS 18

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedSeptember 29, 1892

DocketNo. 3010

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 S.E. 963 (Hill v. Burgess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hill v. Burgess, 15 S.E. 963, 37 S.C. 604, 1892 S.C. LEXIS 18 (S.C. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice McGowan,

[604]*604This was an action commenced in a trial justice’s court for the recovery of some lumber. The lumber was purchased by defendant at a sale made by a sawyer, after due advertisement, under authority conferred in an agreement made by one Bullock, tenant of plaintiff, with the sawyer, without plaintiff’s knowledge or consent. Before the sale, defendant had notice of plaintiff’s claim to the lumber. Judgment for plaintiff was, on appeal to the Circuit Court, affirmed. Fraser, J. Defendant appealed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mr. Justice McGowan,

[604]*604This was an action commenced in a trial justice’s court for the recovery of some lumber. The lumber was purchased by defendant at a sale made by a sawyer, after due advertisement, under authority conferred in an agreement made by one Bullock, tenant of plaintiff, with the sawyer, without plaintiff’s knowledge or consent. Before the sale, defendant had notice of plaintiff’s claim to the lumber. Judgment for plaintiff was, on appeal to the Circuit Court, affirmed. Fraser, J. Defendant appealed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 S.E. 963, 37 S.C. 604, 1892 S.C. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-burgess-sc-1892.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack