Hill v. Burgess

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Hill v. Burgess

15 S.E. 963, 37 S.C. 604, 1892 S.C. LEXIS 18

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided September 29, 1892·No. No. 3010·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice McGowan,

[604]*604This was an action commenced in a trial justice’s court for the recovery of some lumber. The lumber was purchased by defendant at a sale made by a sawyer, after due advertisement, under authority conferred in an agreement made by one Bullock, tenant of plaintiff, with the sawyer, without plaintiff’s knowledge or consent. Before the sale, defendant had notice of plaintiff’s claim to the lumber. Judgment for plaintiff was, on appeal to the Circuit Court, affirmed. Fraser, J. Defendant appealed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mr. Justice McGowan,

[604]*604This was an action commenced in a trial justice’s court for the recovery of some lumber. The lumber was purchased by defendant at a sale made by a sawyer, after due advertisement, under authority conferred in an agreement made by one Bullock, tenant of plaintiff, with the sawyer, without plaintiff’s knowledge or consent. Before the sale, defendant had notice of plaintiff’s claim to the lumber. Judgment for plaintiff was, on appeal to the Circuit Court, affirmed. Fraser, J. Defendant appealed.

Hill v. Burgess, 15 S.E. 963, 37 S.C. 604, 1892 S.C. LEXIS 18 (S.C. 1892).

Pincite

15 S.E. 963 (Hill v. Burgess) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related