Hill v. Bugbee

105 A. 893, 92 N.J.L. 514, 7 Gummere 514, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 284
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 11, 1918·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bergen in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. Bugbee, 105 A. 893, 92 N.J.L. 514, 7 Gummere 514, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 284 (N.J. 1918).

105 A. 893 (Hill v. Bugbee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Demchak v. Kingsley
216 A.2d 753 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1966)
Maxwell v. Bugbee
250 U.S. 525 (Supreme Court, 1919)