Hill v. Boutell
3 N.H. 502
This text of 3 N.H. 502 (Hill v. Boutell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hill v. Boutell, 3 N.H. 502 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1826).
Opinion
It is well settled, that in an action for use and occupation, when an express promise to pay is shewn, the defendant cannot be permitted to controvert the title of the [503]*503plaintiff. Buller's N. P. 139.—1 Chitty's Pl. 575.—1 Wilson 314, Lewis vs. Willis.—5 D. & E. 4, Cook vs. Loxley.
We are therefore of opinion, that there must be
J1 new trial granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hatch v. Bullock
57 N.H. 15 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1876)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 N.H. 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-boutell-nhsuperct-1826.