Hill v. Bennett
128 S.E. 15, 34 Ga. App. 39, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 21
This text of 128 S.E. 15 (Hill v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hill v. Bennett, 128 S.E. 15, 34 Ga. App. 39, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 21 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).
Opinion
1. There is no merit in the ground of the motion for a new trial which alleges that the court erred in excluding from the jury certain testimony. -
2. The court properly directed a verdict for the plaintiff.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
128 S.E. 15, 34 Ga. App. 39, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-bennett-gactapp-1925.