Hill v. Batts

Fourth Circuit

Hill v. Batts

124 F. App'x 801

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 31, 2005·No. No. 05-6175·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Yoshea Maurice Hill appeals the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hill v. Batts, No. CA-04-763-2 (E.D.Va. Jan. 6 & Jan. 24, 2005). We deny [802]*802Hill’s petition for an injunction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Yoshea Maurice Hill appeals the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hill v. Batts, No. CA-04-763-2 (E.D.Va. Jan. 6 & Jan. 24, 2005). We deny [802]*802Hill’s petition for an injunction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Hill v. Batts, 124 F. App'x 801 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

124 F. App'x 801 (Hill v. Batts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related