Hill v. Batts

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 31, 2005
Docket05-6175
StatusUnpublished

This text of Hill v. Batts (Hill v. Batts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. Batts, (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6175

YOSHEA MAURICE HILL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SAM BATTS, Assistant Warden; BETTY ZOLICOFFER, Building Lieutenant; MR. MERRITT, Complex Investigator,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-04-763-2)

Submitted: March 24, 2005 Decided: March 31, 2005

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yoshea Maurice Hill, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Yoshea Maurice Hill appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint

and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Hill v. Batts, No.

CA-04-763-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 6 & Jan. 24, 2005). We deny Hill’s

petition for an injunction. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hill v. Batts, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-batts-ca4-2005.