Hill v. Achiah

95 A.D.3d 646, 943 N.Y.S.2d 885

This text of 95 A.D.3d 646 (Hill v. Achiah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. Achiah, 95 A.D.3d 646, 943 N.Y.S.2d 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mitchell Danziger, J.), entered December 27, 2011, which, in an action for personal injuries allegedly sustained when plaintiff pedestrian was struck by defendants’ vehicle as she crossed the street, denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment in plaintiffs favor was properly denied since the conflicting accounts of plaintiff and defendant driver raise triable issues of fact as to how the accident occurred (see Negron v Garcia, 85 AD3d 513 [2011]). Concur — Saxe, J.P., Sweeny, Acosta, Freedman and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Negron v. Garcia
85 A.D.3d 513 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 A.D.3d 646, 943 N.Y.S.2d 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-achiah-nyappdiv-2012.