Hill Syrup Co. v. National City Bank
This text of 233 P. 669 (Hill Syrup Co. v. National City Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On Rehearing.
The evidence in this case does not bring it within the rule of the case of Hill Syrup Co. v. Frederick & Nelson, ante p. 155, 233 Pac. 663. Each case must be determined upon its own record and the facts therein must be supported by the evidence in that particular case. In this case there is no evidence from which it can be found that the Hill Syrup Company was negligent in permitting the practice of Sander in paying his individual debts with corporate funds to begin and continue. It follows, therefore, that the Departmental opinion, Hill Syrup Co. v. National City Bank of Seattle, 129 Wash. 171, 224 Pac. 578, must be adhered to.
Tolman, C. J., Mitchell, Parker, Bridges, Askren, Mackintosh, and Holcomb, JJ., concur.
Fullerton, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
233 P. 669, 133 Wash. 696, 1925 Wash. LEXIS 1183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-syrup-co-v-national-city-bank-wash-1925.