Hill Syrup Co. v. National City Bank

233 P. 669, 133 Wash. 696, 1925 Wash. LEXIS 1183
Washington Supreme Court·Decided February 25, 1925·No. No. 18365. En Banc.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

On Rehearing.

Main, J.

The evidence in this case does not bring it within the rule of the case of Hill Syrup Co. v. Frederick & Nelson, ante p. 155, 233 Pac. 663. Each case must be determined upon its own record and the facts therein must be supported by the evidence in that particular case. In this case there is no evidence from which it can be found that the Hill Syrup Company was negligent in permitting the practice of Sander in paying his individual debts with corporate funds to begin and continue. It follows, therefore, that the Departmental opinion, Hill Syrup Co. v. National City Bank of Seattle, 129 Wash. 171, 224 Pac. 578, must be adhered to.

Tolman, C. J., Mitchell, Parker, Bridges, Askren, Mackintosh, and Holcomb, JJ., concur.

Fullerton, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill Syrup Co. v. National City Bank, 233 P. 669, 133 Wash. 696, 1925 Wash. LEXIS 1183 (Wash. 1925).

233 P. 669 (Hill Syrup Co. v. National City Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hemrich v. National Bank of Commerce
251 P. 774 (Washington Supreme Court, 1927)