Hill Syrup Co. v. Marine National Bank

233 P. 668, 133 Wash. 695, 1925 Wash. LEXIS 1182
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill Syrup Co. v. Marine National Bank. Read the opinion of the Court — 128 Wash. 509
Washington Supreme Court·Decided February 24, 1925·No. No. 18617. En Banc.·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Except in the number of checks involved, the payee' named, and the peculiar circumstances under which the checks came into the possession of the respondent or it acquired the proceeds thereof, this case is identical with that of Hill Syrup Co. v. Frederick & Nelson, ante p. 155, 233 Pac. 663. Indeed, by stipulation, the two cases were tried upon the same record, with the exceptions indicated. The same rule of law must therefore be applied.

For the reasons given in Hill Syrup Co. v. Frederick & Nelson, supra, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Fullerton, J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill Syrup Co. v. Marine National Bank, 233 P. 668, 133 Wash. 695, 1925 Wash. LEXIS 1182 (Wash. 1925).

233 P. 668 (Hill Syrup Co. v. Marine National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill Syrup Co. v. Frederick & Nelson
233 P. 663 (Washington Supreme Court, 1925)