Hill, Michael Anthony
This text of Hill, Michael Anthony (Hill, Michael Anthony) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
·--... WRIT /1/!J. WR-'J:5;5fb-D5 CJ6,51W-as ·Tr. Ch /V£1, WOC1 . 55a98'-WCD) · (]er/c. A/x/ /1 __ .,_\ t?\ (1 1/c~ cr~ "'-' ,/)p;1L/. ~ .. I~ ,o·- . RECEIVED IN document contams som~oURTOFCRfMINALAPPEALS ~r 1 /J 1 v&- --- I ? Pt. 7-- !Jages that are of poor quality E~t the time of imaging. MAR 26 2015 ttWt-lvt 1 leX~ ~'?II Absl Acosta, Clerk . . WRIT No. lttlf<-~51 6lb_-o5 /
£X PA!
Jj_
· Affhca.;t{- UJq,_'S d&lied ht· ':> ('(8 (;, '>r- k ~~ +4-c demc.J es>.f. ~t s 11-fPh~c..ho"" ~"" VVrt 't-d- -Hc.. foeq__s. CDrpl.) S . 6 3 o~5 ]:IVMATC .DECL...Al L.~ Mkh~l flnt-htS>"'Y, IIi(~ aiM fh-e Off~t;tzi-_, Ci~d b-el1), (Jrc5eV\+-ly IVJCC!(('C.~..fed /VI. ( iXJ- CJD deebrc t»der pev~al{y ef.- fUt;Jcr''f +h~+- q~oa;lit) -/o 1M y helfcl1 fh-e fad::S 6/a-1-ec/ '"" fh-c a/::XJu-e M<:Jfr'ot/1 ar-e -!-rue . qvzd Cerrec.+.' · , 6f5V1~ fltrs fh-e dare! cky of Ma.rc4 (}0/5 ...1 ; A-ll ACHM E!Jir I .· ·. Wrd- &. Wt>J-5531~-wcoJ C..CJ? /Vo. WR-d-S 1 51(;,-0Li h"/ed .6Y\ /I - /7 - d-O I ~ 0~~ GseJ- -·-- Ti'~c CreclJ-s. --- SCANNED c:~ \ L :-:L- \)• WRIT NO. W03-55398-W(C) EX PARTE § IN THE § MICHAEL ANTHONY HILL § STATE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT,· CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER Having considered the applicant's Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the State's Response, and official court records in the challenged conviction, the Court finds there are no controverted, previously unresolved facts material to the legality of the applicant's confinement. The Court adopts as Findings of Fact the history of the case as set forth in the State's Response and further makes the following findings of fact: 1. The Court finds that applicant's complaint about the TDCJ' s calculation of his good-time and work-time credits are not cognizable on a writ of habeas corpus. See Ex parte Palomo, 759 S.W.2d 671,671 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). 2. The Court recommends that applicant's Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied. ORDERS OF THE COURT In implementing the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the CLERK IS ORDERED _. to do the following: 1 -~---·-------- ---. ·-· - -··· ---~·-- 1. Prepare a transcript of all papers in this cause and transmit the Court's Findings and Order, including the judgment and indictment, docket sheets, and other exhibits and evidentiary matter filed in the trial records of this cause to the Court of Criminal Appeals as provided by article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Send a signed copy of these Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order to Grace Shin, counsel for the State, and to applicant and his counsel, if any, by depositing same in the U.S. mail. By the following signature, the Court adopts the State's Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order. SIGNED this J day of _ _ _ ...t._/ltv-=----·---'--' 20l4. JUD 2 ATTifCH!J!Jl//11 ]L Tr. Ct. ;1/o. Wo3-5539r (DJ C. C,? Nt>. WR-J 51 5fto,o<5 . h led ($)/1 D;L- O'i ~dO l ~ ~\- J''::t«vtdaifry ,;_Qt:per}J /() f § IN THE 363RD JUDICIAl, § DISTRICT COURT § DALLASCOUNTY,TEXAS STATE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT,, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER Having considered the applicant's Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the State's Response, and official court records in the challenged conviction, the Court finds there are no controverted, previously unresolved facts material to the legality of the applicant's confinement. The Court adopts as Findings of Fact the history of the. case as set forth in the State's Response and further makes the following fmdings of fact: 1. The Court has reviewed applicant's complaints about the parole board's decision to deny his release to mandatory supervision. 2. The parole board has the discretionary authority to decide whether an eligible inmate will be released to mandatory supervision if it makes certain findings. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 508.149(b) (West Supp. 2014). The parole board's determination under section 508 .149(b) is not subject to judicial review. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 508.149(d) (West Supp. 2014); Ex parte Hill, 208 S.W.3d 462,464 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Page 1 of3 O R]·G,ll'~AL .... ~ ..,_.._ 3. The Court finds it has no authority to review the parole board's decision to deny applicant's release to mandatory supervis.on. 4. The Court finds that applicant's Application for Writ of Habeas Coq}us is without merit and recommends that relief be denied. In implementing the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the CLERK IS ORDERED to: 1. Prepare a transcript of all papers in this cause and transmit the Court's Findings and Order, including the judgment and indictment, docket sheets, and other exhibits and evidentiary matter filed in the trial records of this cause to the Court of Criminal Appeals as provided by article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Send a signed copy of these Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order to Grace E. Shin, counsel for the State, and to applicant and his counsel, if any, by depositing same in the U.S. mail. Page 2 of3 -""": -~- ........... ~--'!.- ·- ----~--- --~~--- ~-..........,•• ~--- ..... By the following signature, the Court adopts the State's Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order. --~+--L---~---' 2015 . ____ ........,_ Page 3 of3 AT!ItCfl}l/~1/lT J1L lnvi {roo~ 6 J; ps l e;)oJ Y'tC: ( ( ar-d u ed avld ptdc_ed up dct/es NOTIFICATION TO COME BY MAIL ROOM NOTIFICATION TO COME BY MAlL 1{00M mate Name q ll, M,chtle--1 1 mate No. J'?.>o2J S 5 o.--r-r::rn~Hrr---=>te is required tci come to the m~il room is required to come to the mail room · f '[) ·/ C ::;;! : M.) CJ· ;v,... 2 . () C· t)U-f garding the following matter: regarding the following matter: _ _ Questionable Correspondence • : - - - Questionable Correspondence _ _ Questionable Publication • .__ _ Questionable Publication _ _ Package 1 . ' - - - - Package f i !\ X A Legal, Special, or Media Correspondence _Other , '!ate's Signature/ vf"1/ Jf;A1, 1 / L _ Legal, Special, or Media Correspondence
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hill, Michael Anthony, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-michael-anthony-texapp-2015.