Hill International, Inc. v. Atlantic City Board of Education

135 A.3d 144, 224 N.J. 523, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 322
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 18, 2016·Published

Opinion

The Court having granted the motion for leave to appeal of defendants, SOSH Architects, et al. (A-57-14), and the motion for leave to cross-appeal of plaintiff, Cobra Construction Company, Inc. (A-64-14), and counsel for plaintiff having represented to the Court in response to the notice of oral argument that plaintiff will not be appearing for argument; it is hereby

ORDERED that plaintiffs cross-appeal (A-64-14) is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute; and it is further

ORDERED that defendants’ appeal (A-57-14) is dismissed without prejudice to defendants moving before this Court to reopen that appeal should plaintiff prosecute its complaint on the remand ordered by the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Jurisdiction is not retained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill International, Inc. v. Atlantic City Board of Education, 135 A.3d 144, 224 N.J. 523, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 322 (N.J. 2016).

135 A.3d 144 (Hill International, Inc. v. Atlantic City Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.