Hill, Fontaine & Co. v. Cherry

1 Gunby 45
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJuly 1, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Gunby 45 (Hill, Fontaine & Co. v. Cherry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill, Fontaine & Co. v. Cherry, 1 Gunby 45 (La. Ct. App. 1885).

Opinion

Gunby, J.

Where two things are sold together, a defect in one will not authorize the redhibition of both, unless they are so matched that their association enhances the value of each, such as match horses, a set of tools, etc.

2. “ Apparent defects ” in horses are such as are visible on a simple inspection to a person of ordinary intelligence and experience; what would be apparent to one man would not be apparent to another, depending on the skill and knowledge of the observer.

3. While it is the duty of the buyer to be cautious, it is the duty of the seller to be candid ; fraudulent silence as to the existence of defects known to the seller makes him liable, even where there has been an express exclusion of all warranty. C. C. 2504; 17 An. 48; 33 An. 1368; 13 Wallace, 383.

Where the sale is annulled, the buyer owes rent for the stock during the time he has used them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Gunby 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-fontaine-co-v-cherry-lactapp-1885.