Hill, Camesha v. Allegis Group

2019 TN WC 122
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedAugust 9, 2019
Docket2018-01-0675
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 TN WC 122 (Hill, Camesha v. Allegis Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill, Camesha v. Allegis Group, 2019 TN WC 122 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2019).

Opinion

FILED Aug 09, 2019

10:40 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT CHATTANOOGA

Camesha Hill, ) Docket No.: 2018-01-0675 Employee, )

Vv. )

Allegis Group, ) State File No.: 8566-2018 Employer, )

And )

Agri General Insurance Co., ) Judge Audrey Headrick Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

The Court conducted an Expedited Hearing on August 6, 2019. The issue is whether Ms. Hill is likely to establish at trial that she is entitled to a panel of shoulder orthopedists after a direct referral doctor declined to see her. Allegis Group disputes her entitlement to a panel, asserting that the provision of a panel is optional after an employer provides an initial panel. For the reasons below, Ms. Hill is not entitled to another panel.

History of Claim

An automobile trunk lid hit Ms. Hill on the head while she was working for Allegis Group, a temporary agency, at Volkswagen on January 24, 2018. She initially received emergency care and later selected Dr. Natasha Ballard from a panel. After conservative treatment of Ms. Hill’s cervical spine was unsuccessful, Dr. Ballard referred her to Dr. Timothy Strait, a neurosurgeon.

Instead of seeing Dr. Strait, the parties agreed that Dr. Ballard made a direct referral for Ms. Hill to see Dr. Joseph Miller, a neurosurgeon.’ Dr. Miller diagnosed a cervical disc protrusion and provided conservative treatment. He determined Ms. Hill was not a surgical candidate “at [that] time,” and he placed her at maximum medical

' The medical records submitted do not reflect a direct referral to Dr. Miller. improvement from a neurosurgical standpoint. Dr. Miller also referred Ms. Hill to Dr. J. Dorizas, one of his partners, for Ms. Hill’s right shoulder.

Allegis Group attempted to schedule Ms. Hill with Dr. Dorizas, but his office provided a handwritten response indicating that Dr. Dorizas “doesn’t see w/c.” However, that response also stated that Dr. Brandon Cincere, a partner of Dr. Miller and Dr. Dorizas, did accept workers’ compensation patients. The doctor’s office sent the necessary form for Allegis Group to schedule an appointment with Dr. Cincere, should he agree to accept her as a patient.

Dr. Cincere accepted Ms. Hill as a patient and treated her from November 2018 through April 2019. At the first visit, Dr. Cincere questioned whether the impact to Ms. Hill’s head caused her shoulder condition. By March, Dr. Cincere provided an opinion that, despite assigning several shoulder diagnoses, only her right suprascapular neuropathy “may be related” to the January 24, 2018 injury.

Ms. Hill argued she is entitled to a panel because Allegis Group failed to provide her with one after Dr. Dorizas declined to see her. She contended that Allegis Group permitted the nurse case manager to merely send her to Dr. Cincere. Conversely, Allegis Group argued Dr. Miller and Dr. Dorizas’s office referred Ms. Hill to Dr. Cincere, a doctor in the same practice group. Therefore, Allegis Group maintained it complied with the law when it provided her the initial panel from which she selected Dr. Ballard, and the law does not require it to provide Ms. Hill with another panel.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Standard Applied

At an expedited hearing, Ms. Hill must present sufficient evidence to prove she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2018). The Court holds she did not.

Medical Benefits

The sole issue is Ms. Hill’s request for a panel. Under the Workers’ Compensation Law, the employer is required to “furnish, free of charge to the employee, such medical and surgical treatment . . . made reasonably necessary by accident[.]” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(1)(A). When the treating physician refers the employee to a specialist physician, the employer must provide a panel of specialists within three business days unless it accepts the referral. In cases where an employer provided a panel of specialists, the selected panel physician “shall become the treating physician until treatment by the specialist physician . . . concludes and the employee has been referred back to the treating physician selected by the employee from the initial panel provided by

2 the employer under subdivision (a)(3)(A).” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(3)(A) and (E).

Here, Allegis Group provided Ms. Hill with a panel, and she selected Dr. Ballard. The parties agree that Dr. Ballard referred Ms. Hill to Dr. Miller, who referred her to his partner, Dr. Dorizas, for her shoulder. The Court is not persuaded by Ms. Hill’s argument that the nurse case manager referred her to Dr. Cincere. Instead, Dr. Miller and Dr. Dorizas’s office notified Allegis Group in writing that Dr. Dorizas did not accept workers’ compensation patients, but their partner, Dr. Cincere, did. Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204(a)(3)(A) permits Allegis Group to either provide a panel of specialists within three business days of the referral or accept the referrals. Allegis Group accepted the referrals, and Ms. Hill treated with Dr. Cincere for five months until he provided an equivocal causation opinion regarding her shoulder. The law does not require Allegis Group to provide Ms. Hill with another panel. Rhodes v. Amazon.com, LLC, 2019 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *22 (June 11, 2019). Therefore, the Court holds Ms. Hill is unlikely to prevail at a hearing on the merits regarding her request for another panel.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows: 1. Ms. Hill’s requested relief is denied at this time.

2. This case is set for a Status Hearing on Wednesday, October 16, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time. You must call 423-634-0164 or toll-free at 855-383-0001 to participate. Failure to call might result in a determination of the issues without your participation.

ENTERED August 9, 2019.

oO ~ Cur ner oes A i tc Judge Audrey A. Headrick

Court of Workers*€ompensation Claims APPENDIX

Exhibits: 1. Affidavit of Camesha Hill 2. Medical records with Table of Content: a. Dr. Natasha Ballard b. Dr. Joseph Miller c. Dr. Paul Hoffmann d. Dr. Brandon Cincere 3. Medical record of Erlanger Orthopaedics 4. Temporary Total Disability Payment Records 5. Panel

Technical record: 1. Petition for Benefit Determination 2. Request for Expedited Hearing 3. Dispute Certification Notice 4. Notice of Deposition 5. Notice of Expedited Hearing 6. Amended Notice of Deposition 7. Employer and Carrier’s Witness and Exhibit List 8. Notice of Filing Medical Records with Table of Contents 9. Employee’s Witness and Exhibit List 10. Notice of Filing of Records on Temporary Total Disability Payments to Employee CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this Expedited Hearing Order was sent as indicated on August 9,

2019. Name Certified Email Service sent to: Mail Charles G. Wright, Jr., xX wrightandwoodard@gmail.com Employee Attorney David J. Deming, x ddeming@manierherod.com Employer’s Attorney x tjoiner@manierherod.com L Wh AU Dare

Penny Shrum Clerk of Court Court of Woi/|k/rs’ Compensation Claims WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-204
Tennessee § 50-6-204(a)(1)(A)
§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(d)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 TN WC 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-camesha-v-allegis-group-tennworkcompcl-2019.