FILED Aug 09, 2019
10:40 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
CLAIMS
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS
AT CHATTANOOGA
Camesha Hill, ) Docket No.: 2018-01-0675 Employee, )
Vv. )
Allegis Group, ) State File No.: 8566-2018 Employer, )
And )
Agri General Insurance Co., ) Judge Audrey Headrick Carrier. )
EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER
The Court conducted an Expedited Hearing on August 6, 2019. The issue is whether Ms. Hill is likely to establish at trial that she is entitled to a panel of shoulder orthopedists after a direct referral doctor declined to see her. Allegis Group disputes her entitlement to a panel, asserting that the provision of a panel is optional after an employer provides an initial panel. For the reasons below, Ms. Hill is not entitled to another panel.
History of Claim
An automobile trunk lid hit Ms. Hill on the head while she was working for Allegis Group, a temporary agency, at Volkswagen on January 24, 2018. She initially received emergency care and later selected Dr. Natasha Ballard from a panel. After conservative treatment of Ms. Hill’s cervical spine was unsuccessful, Dr. Ballard referred her to Dr. Timothy Strait, a neurosurgeon.
Instead of seeing Dr. Strait, the parties agreed that Dr. Ballard made a direct referral for Ms. Hill to see Dr. Joseph Miller, a neurosurgeon.’ Dr. Miller diagnosed a cervical disc protrusion and provided conservative treatment. He determined Ms. Hill was not a surgical candidate “at [that] time,” and he placed her at maximum medical
' The medical records submitted do not reflect a direct referral to Dr. Miller. improvement from a neurosurgical standpoint. Dr. Miller also referred Ms. Hill to Dr. J. Dorizas, one of his partners, for Ms. Hill’s right shoulder.
Allegis Group attempted to schedule Ms. Hill with Dr. Dorizas, but his office provided a handwritten response indicating that Dr. Dorizas “doesn’t see w/c.” However, that response also stated that Dr. Brandon Cincere, a partner of Dr. Miller and Dr. Dorizas, did accept workers’ compensation patients. The doctor’s office sent the necessary form for Allegis Group to schedule an appointment with Dr. Cincere, should he agree to accept her as a patient.
Dr. Cincere accepted Ms. Hill as a patient and treated her from November 2018 through April 2019. At the first visit, Dr. Cincere questioned whether the impact to Ms. Hill’s head caused her shoulder condition. By March, Dr. Cincere provided an opinion that, despite assigning several shoulder diagnoses, only her right suprascapular neuropathy “may be related” to the January 24, 2018 injury.
Ms. Hill argued she is entitled to a panel because Allegis Group failed to provide her with one after Dr. Dorizas declined to see her. She contended that Allegis Group permitted the nurse case manager to merely send her to Dr. Cincere. Conversely, Allegis Group argued Dr. Miller and Dr. Dorizas’s office referred Ms. Hill to Dr. Cincere, a doctor in the same practice group. Therefore, Allegis Group maintained it complied with the law when it provided her the initial panel from which she selected Dr. Ballard, and the law does not require it to provide Ms. Hill with another panel.
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Standard Applied
At an expedited hearing, Ms. Hill must present sufficient evidence to prove she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2018). The Court holds she did not.
Medical Benefits
The sole issue is Ms. Hill’s request for a panel. Under the Workers’ Compensation Law, the employer is required to “furnish, free of charge to the employee, such medical and surgical treatment . . . made reasonably necessary by accident[.]” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(1)(A). When the treating physician refers the employee to a specialist physician, the employer must provide a panel of specialists within three business days unless it accepts the referral. In cases where an employer provided a panel of specialists, the selected panel physician “shall become the treating physician until treatment by the specialist physician . . . concludes and the employee has been referred back to the treating physician selected by the employee from the initial panel provided by
2 the employer under subdivision (a)(3)(A).” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(3)(A) and (E).
Here, Allegis Group provided Ms. Hill with a panel, and she selected Dr. Ballard. The parties agree that Dr. Ballard referred Ms. Hill to Dr. Miller, who referred her to his partner, Dr. Dorizas, for her shoulder. The Court is not persuaded by Ms. Hill’s argument that the nurse case manager referred her to Dr. Cincere. Instead, Dr. Miller and Dr. Dorizas’s office notified Allegis Group in writing that Dr. Dorizas did not accept workers’ compensation patients, but their partner, Dr. Cincere, did. Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204(a)(3)(A) permits Allegis Group to either provide a panel of specialists within three business days of the referral or accept the referrals. Allegis Group accepted the referrals, and Ms. Hill treated with Dr. Cincere for five months until he provided an equivocal causation opinion regarding her shoulder. The law does not require Allegis Group to provide Ms. Hill with another panel. Rhodes v. Amazon.com, LLC, 2019 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *22 (June 11, 2019). Therefore, the Court holds Ms. Hill is unlikely to prevail at a hearing on the merits regarding her request for another panel.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows: 1. Ms. Hill’s requested relief is denied at this time.
2. This case is set for a Status Hearing on Wednesday, October 16, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time. You must call 423-634-0164 or toll-free at 855-383-0001 to participate. Failure to call might result in a determination of the issues without your participation.
ENTERED August 9, 2019.
oO ~ Cur ner oes A i tc Judge Audrey A. Headrick
Court of Workers*€ompensation Claims APPENDIX
Exhibits: 1. Affidavit of Camesha Hill 2. Medical records with Table of Content: a. Dr. Natasha Ballard b. Dr. Joseph Miller c. Dr. Paul Hoffmann d. Dr. Brandon Cincere 3. Medical record of Erlanger Orthopaedics 4. Temporary Total Disability Payment Records 5. Panel
Technical record: 1. Petition for Benefit Determination 2. Request for Expedited Hearing 3. Dispute Certification Notice 4. Notice of Deposition 5. Notice of Expedited Hearing 6. Amended Notice of Deposition 7. Employer and Carrier’s Witness and Exhibit List 8. Notice of Filing Medical Records with Table of Contents 9. Employee’s Witness and Exhibit List 10. Notice of Filing of Records on Temporary Total Disability Payments to Employee CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a copy of this Expedited Hearing Order was sent as indicated on August 9,
2019. Name Certified Email Service sent to: Mail Charles G. Wright, Jr., xX wrightandwoodard@gmail.com Employee Attorney David J. Deming, x ddeming@manierherod.com Employer’s Attorney x tjoiner@manierherod.com L Wh AU Dare
Penny Shrum Clerk of Court Court of Woi/|k/rs’ Compensation Claims WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov
Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:
If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:
1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
FILED Aug 09, 2019
10:40 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
CLAIMS
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS
AT CHATTANOOGA
Camesha Hill, ) Docket No.: 2018-01-0675 Employee, )
Vv. )
Allegis Group, ) State File No.: 8566-2018 Employer, )
And )
Agri General Insurance Co., ) Judge Audrey Headrick Carrier. )
EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER
The Court conducted an Expedited Hearing on August 6, 2019. The issue is whether Ms. Hill is likely to establish at trial that she is entitled to a panel of shoulder orthopedists after a direct referral doctor declined to see her. Allegis Group disputes her entitlement to a panel, asserting that the provision of a panel is optional after an employer provides an initial panel. For the reasons below, Ms. Hill is not entitled to another panel.
History of Claim
An automobile trunk lid hit Ms. Hill on the head while she was working for Allegis Group, a temporary agency, at Volkswagen on January 24, 2018. She initially received emergency care and later selected Dr. Natasha Ballard from a panel. After conservative treatment of Ms. Hill’s cervical spine was unsuccessful, Dr. Ballard referred her to Dr. Timothy Strait, a neurosurgeon.
Instead of seeing Dr. Strait, the parties agreed that Dr. Ballard made a direct referral for Ms. Hill to see Dr. Joseph Miller, a neurosurgeon.’ Dr. Miller diagnosed a cervical disc protrusion and provided conservative treatment. He determined Ms. Hill was not a surgical candidate “at [that] time,” and he placed her at maximum medical
' The medical records submitted do not reflect a direct referral to Dr. Miller. improvement from a neurosurgical standpoint. Dr. Miller also referred Ms. Hill to Dr. J. Dorizas, one of his partners, for Ms. Hill’s right shoulder.
Allegis Group attempted to schedule Ms. Hill with Dr. Dorizas, but his office provided a handwritten response indicating that Dr. Dorizas “doesn’t see w/c.” However, that response also stated that Dr. Brandon Cincere, a partner of Dr. Miller and Dr. Dorizas, did accept workers’ compensation patients. The doctor’s office sent the necessary form for Allegis Group to schedule an appointment with Dr. Cincere, should he agree to accept her as a patient.
Dr. Cincere accepted Ms. Hill as a patient and treated her from November 2018 through April 2019. At the first visit, Dr. Cincere questioned whether the impact to Ms. Hill’s head caused her shoulder condition. By March, Dr. Cincere provided an opinion that, despite assigning several shoulder diagnoses, only her right suprascapular neuropathy “may be related” to the January 24, 2018 injury.
Ms. Hill argued she is entitled to a panel because Allegis Group failed to provide her with one after Dr. Dorizas declined to see her. She contended that Allegis Group permitted the nurse case manager to merely send her to Dr. Cincere. Conversely, Allegis Group argued Dr. Miller and Dr. Dorizas’s office referred Ms. Hill to Dr. Cincere, a doctor in the same practice group. Therefore, Allegis Group maintained it complied with the law when it provided her the initial panel from which she selected Dr. Ballard, and the law does not require it to provide Ms. Hill with another panel.
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Standard Applied
At an expedited hearing, Ms. Hill must present sufficient evidence to prove she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2018). The Court holds she did not.
Medical Benefits
The sole issue is Ms. Hill’s request for a panel. Under the Workers’ Compensation Law, the employer is required to “furnish, free of charge to the employee, such medical and surgical treatment . . . made reasonably necessary by accident[.]” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(1)(A). When the treating physician refers the employee to a specialist physician, the employer must provide a panel of specialists within three business days unless it accepts the referral. In cases where an employer provided a panel of specialists, the selected panel physician “shall become the treating physician until treatment by the specialist physician . . . concludes and the employee has been referred back to the treating physician selected by the employee from the initial panel provided by
2 the employer under subdivision (a)(3)(A).” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(3)(A) and (E).
Here, Allegis Group provided Ms. Hill with a panel, and she selected Dr. Ballard. The parties agree that Dr. Ballard referred Ms. Hill to Dr. Miller, who referred her to his partner, Dr. Dorizas, for her shoulder. The Court is not persuaded by Ms. Hill’s argument that the nurse case manager referred her to Dr. Cincere. Instead, Dr. Miller and Dr. Dorizas’s office notified Allegis Group in writing that Dr. Dorizas did not accept workers’ compensation patients, but their partner, Dr. Cincere, did. Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204(a)(3)(A) permits Allegis Group to either provide a panel of specialists within three business days of the referral or accept the referrals. Allegis Group accepted the referrals, and Ms. Hill treated with Dr. Cincere for five months until he provided an equivocal causation opinion regarding her shoulder. The law does not require Allegis Group to provide Ms. Hill with another panel. Rhodes v. Amazon.com, LLC, 2019 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *22 (June 11, 2019). Therefore, the Court holds Ms. Hill is unlikely to prevail at a hearing on the merits regarding her request for another panel.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows: 1. Ms. Hill’s requested relief is denied at this time.
2. This case is set for a Status Hearing on Wednesday, October 16, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time. You must call 423-634-0164 or toll-free at 855-383-0001 to participate. Failure to call might result in a determination of the issues without your participation.
ENTERED August 9, 2019.
oO ~ Cur ner oes A i tc Judge Audrey A. Headrick
Court of Workers*€ompensation Claims APPENDIX
Exhibits: 1. Affidavit of Camesha Hill 2. Medical records with Table of Content: a. Dr. Natasha Ballard b. Dr. Joseph Miller c. Dr. Paul Hoffmann d. Dr. Brandon Cincere 3. Medical record of Erlanger Orthopaedics 4. Temporary Total Disability Payment Records 5. Panel
Technical record: 1. Petition for Benefit Determination 2. Request for Expedited Hearing 3. Dispute Certification Notice 4. Notice of Deposition 5. Notice of Expedited Hearing 6. Amended Notice of Deposition 7. Employer and Carrier’s Witness and Exhibit List 8. Notice of Filing Medical Records with Table of Contents 9. Employee’s Witness and Exhibit List 10. Notice of Filing of Records on Temporary Total Disability Payments to Employee CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a copy of this Expedited Hearing Order was sent as indicated on August 9,
2019. Name Certified Email Service sent to: Mail Charles G. Wright, Jr., xX wrightandwoodard@gmail.com Employee Attorney David J. Deming, x ddeming@manierherod.com Employer’s Attorney x tjoiner@manierherod.com L Wh AU Dare
Penny Shrum Clerk of Court Court of Woi/|k/rs’ Compensation Claims WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov
Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:
If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:
1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.
2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully- completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of the appeal.
3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.
4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.
For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667. LB-1099
EXPEDITED HEARING NOTICE OF APPEAL Tennessee Division of Workers’ Compensation www. tn.gov/labor-wid/weomp.shtml wce.courtclerk@tn.gov 1-800-332-2667
Docket #: State File #/YR:
Employee
Vv.
Employer Notice Notice is given that
[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies) on separate sheet if necessary]
appeals the order(s) of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims at
to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals
Board. [List the date(s) the order(s) was filed in the court clerk’s office]
Judge
Statement of the Issues Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:
Additional Information Type of Case [Check the most appropriate item]
L] Temporary disability benefits L] Medical benefits for current injury LC Medical benefits under prior order issued by the Court
List of Parties Appellant (Requesting Party): At Hearing: LJEmployer LJEmployee
Address:
Party’s Phone: Email: Attorney's Name: BPR#: Attorney’s Address: Phone:
Attorney's City, State & Zip code:
Attorney’s Email:
* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *
rev. 10/18 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082 Employee Name: SF#: DOI:
Appellee(s)
Appellee (Opposing Party): At Hearing: L]JEmployer LJEmployee
Appellee’s Address:
Appellee’s Phone: Email: Attorney’s Name: BPR#: Attorney’s Address: Phone:
Attorney’s City, State & Zip code:
* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal by First Class, United States Mail, postage prepaid, to all parties
and/or their attorneys in this case in accordance with Rule 0800-02-22.01(2) of the Tennessee Rules of Board of Workers’ Compensation Appeals on this the day of , 20
, certify that | have forwarded a true and exact copy of this
[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]
LB-1099 rev. 10/18 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082
Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation 220 French Landing Drive, I-B Nashville, TN 37243-1002 800-332-2667
AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY
I, , having been duly sworn according to law, make oath that because of my poverty, | am unable to bear the costs of this appeal and request that the filing fee to appeal be waived. The following facts support my poverty.
1. Full Name: 2. Address:
3. Telephone Number: 4. Date of Birth: 5. Names and Ages of Ail Dependents:
Relationship:
6. lam employed by:
My employer’s address is:
My employer’s phone number is:
7. My present monthly household income, after federal income and social security taxes are deducted, is:
$
8. | receive or expect to receive money from the following sources:
AFDC $ per month beginning ssl $ per month beginning Retirement $ per month beginning Disability $ per month beginning Unemployment $ per month beginning Worker's Comp.$ per month beginning Other $ per month beginning
LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082 9. My expenses are:
Rent/House Payment $ permonth Medical/Dental $ per month
Groceries $ per month Telephone $ per month
Electricity $ per month School Supplies $ per month
Water $ per month Clothing $ per month
Gas $ per month Child Care $ per month
Transportation $ per month Child Support $ per month
Car $ per month
Other $ per month (describe: ) 10. Assets:
Automobile $ (FMV)
Checking/Savings Acct. $
House $ __ (FMV)
Other $ Describe:
11. My debts are:
Amount Owed To Whom
| hereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing answers are true, correct, and complete and that I am financially unable to pay the costs of this appeal.
APPELLANT
Sworn and subscribed before me, a notary public, this
day of , 20
NOTARY PUBLIC
My Commission Expires:
LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082