Hill, Boyd & Co. v. Childs

Supreme Court of Iowa

Hill, Boyd & Co. v. Childs

69 Iowa 763

DecidedJune 10, 1886

StatusPublished

This text of 69 Iowa 763 (Hill, Boyd & Co. v. Childs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hill, Boyd & Co. v. Childs, 69 Iowa 763 (iowa 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Bothrock, J.

The defendants complain of the judgment [764]*764in the court below, for the reason that the amount thereof is greatly in excess of what it should be under the evidence. We have carefully examined the evidence and arguments of counsel, and our conclusion is that the judgment is correct. It appears to us that the amounts charged and allowed by the court for the several items of the account are shown by a fair preponderance of the evidence to be in accord with the agreement of the parties when the contract for the lumber was made.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bothrock, J.

The defendants complain of the judgment [764]*764in the court below, for the reason that the amount thereof is greatly in excess of what it should be under the evidence. We have carefully examined the evidence and arguments of counsel, and our conclusion is that the judgment is correct. It appears to us that the amounts charged and allowed by the court for the several items of the account are shown by a fair preponderance of the evidence to be in accord with the agreement of the parties when the contract for the lumber was made.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 Iowa 763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-boyd-co-v-childs-iowa-1886.