Hilgeford v. National Union Fire Insurance

Fourth Circuit

Hilgeford v. National Union Fire Insurance

333 F. App'x 784

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 23, 2009·No. No. 09-1163·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Matthew J. Hilgeford appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss his several federal and state law claims against them. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Hilgeford v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, No. 3:08-cv-00669-JRS, 2009 WL 302161 (E.D.Va. Feb. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Matthew J. Hilgeford appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss his several federal and state law claims against them. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Hilgeford v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, No. 3:08-cv-00669-JRS, 2009 WL 302161 (E.D.Va. Feb. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hilgeford v. National Union Fire Insurance, 333 F. App'x 784 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

333 F. App'x 784 (Hilgeford v. National Union Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.